Just me. (lara7) wrote,
Just me.
lara7

posting limits or, some people don't get it.

okay, so LJ brass dropped the ball in instituting posting limits without a lot of notice, and the angry comments in the LJ "news" community (http://www.livejournal.com/users/news/) reflect that. Also, I thought 3 posts per day for free users was a bit restrictive (since upped to 5). BUT:

check out this poll from LJ's architect of limits, Brad:

http://www.livejournal.com/poll/?id=99497

at press time, the answers to the question

Is 50 posts/day for non-free users reasonable?

is 273 No votes (7.7%)

and

Do you understand the need for limits, in some form?
is 118 No votes (3.3%)

Now, unless the people in question 1 are concerned about posts to communities (which would be severely impacted if limited to 50 posts a day, true)- what the hell is wrong with you people? If you can post 50 times in 24 hours, you either need a job, some sleep, or to get the hell away from Quizilla.

As for Question 2- What part of "things cost money, and someone has to pay the bill" don't you 118 people get? You must be the morons whose sub-literate LJs I always get when I hit the random button. Sigh.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    Anonymous comments are disabled in this journal

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

  • 9 comments